trakt.tv

8/9/13

View Logs: Low Winter Sun Prologue

"You cannot replace Breaking Bad."

It's common sentiment around the TV community.  AMC's hit show is ending and being replaced with Low Winter Sun.  A remake of a very dark UK noir 2-parter miniseries.  I'm eager going into this show but also very very nervous.  My expectations are astronomically high especially since AMC has marketed this show as "the next epic series after Breaking Bad."  It seems AMC has confidence in it's remake.

For those who don't know, Low Winter Sun is a gritty crime drama about a couple of police officers who decided to enact a "righteous killing" of a dirty cop.  The show is centered around the two trying to cover up their crime while slowly finding out things about their victim that drags them into further corruption.  The original British miniseries was a self contained story.  One can't help but imagine that AMC will branch away from the British show.  I mean the ending (without spoiling it) resolves everything quite clearly.  And both the principle characters are drowned in their own corruption to the point of no return.  I have literally no idea how AMC intends on making that story a full length series.  Let alone a series that'll last for more than one season.

Then again, Breaking Bad is a bit of a similar type of story where the two principle characters are destroyed by their own flaws.  But there are times where I felt Breaking Bad was a little too drawn out.  Don't get me wrong, I really like the show.  But Breaking Bad has a tendency to navel gaze with it's side characters.  Especially with Hank's wife.   Despite that, it never reached a point (got bad) where it would completely stop because there were always a few loose ends that the writers could exploit and the side plot lines were always well woven into the main storyline.  Just sometimes when the A storyline takes a backseat to the B storyline the writing loses a little bit of direction.

The story of the UK Low Winter Sun is actually a dead end before it even started.  It's a perfect tragedy where the characters had literally no where else to go but down.  At first I thought AMC was going to take this in a different direction but the opening sneak preview is extremely close to the opening of the UK show.  In fact Mark Strong even utters similar lines like "I'm not drunk enough."  So... yeah... AMC has a few challenges to overcome to make a 2-parter UK miniseries into a full fledged TV show if it wants to stay faithful.  I guess it's possible because AMC has worked magic before like in Hell on Wheels and Breaking Bad.  But the writers better be careful.  The plot diversions have to come naturally or else it'll just be another The Killing... or it can go in the extreme opposite direction and be so obtuse and undercooked that it'll be like Rubicon... another weak AMC show.

Either way... it looks promising and Mark Strong is a great actor.  For those who want to see the sneak preview:


8/7/13

Subject Review: Ripper Street, BBC America, Season 1

"It knows what it is and it achieves it well" is a rhetoric that I feel is used a little too liberally these days.  With the critical fad of relativism, it's very difficult to criticize a piece of work in relation to it's peers without running into someone sourly bringing up the defense of "it knows what it is and it achieves it well".  I've often felt that this blanket defense is often missing the point of many criticisms lobbed at works without any kind of ambition (assuming of course you value criticisms and standards in art... but if you're reading me then you probably do on some level).  Criticizing a work for falling short of exploring certain depths isn't a disguised demand to make everything a Emmy-bait show or to make everything "grim and dark".  It's a complaint that a lack of ambition (i.e. making something "fun") often results in a complacency with developing characters.  Whether successful or unsuccessful, Awards Show bait materials often do allow room for the characters to breath and grow.  It's just some are executed poorly and that results in an incredibly dull experience.  But this isn't the fault of the ambition itself.


Ripper Street is a great example of how even just a bit of creative ambition in a material that's "not meant to be deep" can be a positive thing.  This show is aiming low.  It's not a full fledged drama, it's tone is, at times, quite light for it's subject matter (compare this with Copper and you'll see what I mean...), and it branches away from history.  This isn't your Downton Abbey and it's going to win no favors in any awards show period.  Despite that, the writers performed beyond the call of duty and it's all in the characters.  Matthew Macfadyen plays Edmund Reid (who is based on a real person).  He is a moral detective who doesn't always play by the rules and has suffered a recent loss of his daughter which haunts him throughout the series.  Jerome Flynn plays Bennett Drake and is Reid's deputy (really his sidekick) who is a bit thick and a little too quick to use his fists but is a loyal friend.  The final main cast is Adam Rothenberg who plays the American Homer Jackson and hides a dark past from his colleagues.


You might be wondering if I'm messing with you and if I was sarcastic when I praised the show for it's characters.  Because these three are quite cliched.  To put it mildly.  But I'm being completely serious.  The show's characters are great even if they seem like completely generic stereotypes.  But the beauty of Ripper Street is how it treats and develop its characters.  That's where the little bit of creative ambition paid off wonderfully and it made all the difference between this show being a wonderful experience and a boring familiar one.  I understand that the characters are very stock from the get go.  Believe me I was ready to write this show off myself after the pilot.  But many character moments in Ripper Street shine because of how seriously the writers took their world's conflicts.  Reid's personal grief over his departed young daughter is handled with such care that I actually found myself invested in a type of character I often scoff at in other shows and movies.  Drake also becomes much more than just a loyal friend who follows Reid around.  The only character that didn't really pay off for me was Homer Jackson.  The twist with his past is actually handled well (which had a really neat duel that was surprisingly restraint) but his arc wasn't great enough for me.  He's the only character that didn't really escape his own stereotype.

Ripper Street is fun.  It's a show that doesn't take it's premise too seriously but it takes it's characters and their conflicts seriously.  That's really the key to writing beyond your material and so many writers forget that the real heart to a story is the characters.  You can have fun with a silly premise.  You can cut corners with stereotypes.  But you can not cut corners with character development and their subsequent conflicts.  Ripper Street was clever enough to avoid making that mistake.  There's nothing wrong with having fun.  But make sure there's more to the story than just that.  Ripper Street is criminally underrated.


Rating: The crime mysteries in this show aren't anything that interesting and the historical inaccuracies (particularly how efficient the forensic police work is...) limit the show in some ways. But the writers handle their characters with cleverness and respect and the overall experience improves greatly from it.

8/5/13

View Logs: The Killing S3 2-Part Finale

Let me get one thing straight before I talk about the finale (and inevitably... about the show overall).  I am not a writer.  I probably will never be a writer.  I don't have the talent or the skills to be paid to write like the pros in the industry.  I mean... I'm a machine that is built for observation... no more no less.  With that said... that doesn't necessarily mean that I have to be complacent as an audience.  If there is something that I personally feel is poorly executed, I won't shy away from expressing it just because I probably can't do better.

Complacency on both the artist's and the audience's part will never develop art in any form period.  Actually complacency has never developed anything in anything ever.  Just look at the guys at Aperture Science.  Do you think they'd be the massive scientific juggernaut they are now if they were complacent in just creating shower curtains?  Absolutely not.  And now we can bend space and time itself thanks to some ambition.


So when I complain about The Killing, I'm not actually trying to put the people involved in the production down.  Any creative endeavor is a massive commitment and takes a lot of guts, will-power, and talent to see through.  That said, the difficulty of the process shouldn't excuse any lapses in quality in the result.  Again... complacency doesn't develop anything.

So let's get down to the finale.  To be frank, the series suck.  Season 3 didn't become irritatingly bad like Season 1.  But the basic core problems did rear itself again towards the final half of the season.  The first thing to note is just how it's developed as a mystery.  Cheap paperback airport mystery novels generally have a bad reputation due to the story being written in such a procedural way that it doesn't allow the readers to dig into the mystery themselves.    The Killing is basically the same thing.


The best mystery stories are ones where the clues connect to an inevitable end.  In other words, a good mystery story is obtuse in experience but obvious in retrospect.  There's some exceptions to this, but generally speaking mysteries need to avoid seeming like the writer pulled contrivances and conveniences willy-nilly.

The Killing as a show is basically this episode after episode:
Linden and Holder chase after a suspect that looks better and better for the crime as they find clues.  The show takes a break from this to either explore a B plotline or to have character scenes with Linden and Holder.  Just when all the clues seem to perfectly accuse the episode's suspect, suddenly there's either a plot twist or a sudden new clue that points to a different suspect.  Repeat.

There... I just saved you time from watching Season 1 and Season 3.  This is basically exactly how the show is formatted.  Also notice that the show doesn't necessarily weave in character development during the clue searches.  Often times the show will literally halt progress to explore character or navel-gaze before starting again.  This is something you'd expect from a cheap airport paperback mystery.  Not TV and definitely not AMC.  Don't get me wrong.  Not all mysteries need to be ingeniously enigmatic.  I recently have watched BBC's The Bletchley Circle and Whitechapel and those weren't exactly "masterpiece" puzzles.  But at minimum, a mystery show should develop a logical mystery that is possible to predict without being predictable (sounds like a contradiction but really it shouldn't if you understand when and how to reveal information to the audience) interwoven with competent treatment of characters is all I ask and honestly I don't think that's too much at all



Surprisingly, a lot of shows fall below that mark.  You'd figure that those who write mysteries as a career would understand the theories behind what makes a good mystery story (or at least "efficient").  Maybe that's just the academic in me but I've always believed that critical analysis can help develop art and aren't just mere snobby stuffy people complaining.

But back to The Killing, the way the show is written isn't even remotely possible to predict.  The show is pretty rampant with false or misleading information; which is generally fine in moderation. But The Killing is basically all misinformation.  There's no real intrigue here, you're really just waiting for the show to tell you when it's lying to you.  So the way the story is written as a result is less like a mystery and more like a duck duck goose game.  It seems to have to go through almost all of its cast as a "prime suspect" in each episode before it ends and decides arbitrarily on who the real killer is.  Again, that's how poorly written mysteries are put together.

Also, it's funny how the prison plot line was literally there for no other reason than to serve as a character catalyst.  I've said this before in previous view logs and I'll say it again here because it needs to be repeated... if that's all your B plotline is going to do... don't spend so much time on it.  In fact it probably shouldn't be a B plotline at all.  There was no twist with the prison.  Seward's death doesn't mean much (again, beyond being Linden's catalyst for further emotional damage), and the prison guard characters don't really develop all that much.  Was there really a point to any of them?  It just feels like padding at the end of the show and makes it overly drawn out.

 Sooooooo you turned out to be pointless to the story...

Finally, the ending is a straight rip from Se7en... except without the kidnapped victim actually being dead.  It's almost literally the same type of resolution scene as Se7en and it didn't even execute it as well.  The final dialogue between Linden and the actual killer in the car ride is just... lackluster.  The writer(s) tried to be smart there but nothing was really achieved or explored.  All that was there was an obvious exchange between an emotional but moral protagonist against a cold and calculated monster killer... I didn't learn anything more from these characters except that the cold killer had a misguided mission and the protagonist's "good side" could only be pushed so far before becoming destructive... you know... sorta like Se7en...

Looks... familiar?... Seriously just watch this movie over the show...

In the end, The Killing is a show that tries too hard.  I have no idea if the writers overstretched their talent or if there were production issues that muddled the script and story.  Could be both actually... but the actual result is far from satisfactory.  So with all due respect AMC, this show sucks.  Mood and atmosphere alone can't carry a story.  Especially in TV.

7/28/13

View Logs: The Killing S3 Episode 10

Ummm... so there was no plot twist regarding the Warden (yet atleast) or Seward.  Except for the fact that he didn't kill his wife... which we kinda already knew.

God what a mess of an episode... which pains me to say because almost everything about this show is perfect so far... The directing, the acting, the cinematography.  Top notch stuff... The thing that completely doesn't work is the schizophrenic writing... At the end of the day, Seward as a character was just meant to further develop Linden.  Which is fine, I mean that's what supporting cast characters are suppose to do.  But since that's all Seward's character lead up to... why was so much screen time devoted to him?  Remember the side plot with him and his prison friends?   One of which is was an actual friend the other was a bored sociopath.  Was there really any point to all that?  Was Seward suppose to grow some humanity or courage to see his son based on those two encounters?  If so... I totally didn't see it...  One was nice to him and... he kinda didn't really care.  The other was a dick to him and... he also kinda didn't really care.  He didn't even seemed to remember either of them by the time he started to talk exclusively to Linden.  So again... was there suppose to be character development here?  Was Seward suppose to do more than just to serve the main characters?


Regardless of Seward's seasonal development (or rather a lack thereof), the episode alone held a lot of problems that I just hated with The Killing in general.  The writers are very liberal with writing all these really quick plot and character reversals.   Most of them come across as cheap twists that are written in without much or any consequences  It reminds me of the final movie of Pirates of the Caribbean when characters just constantly switched sides for no real overarching reasons.  So that came to an extreme with this episode.  You'll have one scene when Seward goads Linden into believing that she's helping the wrong man.  Then suddenly in the next scene Seward is this docile remorseful victim.


I understand that people can be like that in real life... but fiction is a craft... it's something that actually needs to be developed.  I kept being confused throughout the entire episode trying to figure out whether the writer intended for Seward to be sympathetic or not.  It reminds me of the same type of character whiplash that the Evil Queen had in Once Upon a Time.  There's just no consistency here in Sewards character and some reversals came across so comical that I'm questioning whether I missed and episode or something.


By the time of the "sad" (for some... reason... need I remind you that Seward has done monstrous things even if he's innocent of his wife's killing) execution I just found myself happy I didn't need to see this character in the last two episodes.  So far... Season 3 of The Killing is solid plot wise.  Some twists seem a little unnecessary to me but nothing as extremely outlandish as Season 2.  But character wise it seems that the writers aren't on the same page with each other at all.  The only real solid and consistent development here is Holder and I've greatly enjoyed his arc so far.  Linden was good until this episode... when the very defeated but collected Linden just regressed into an almost mirror version of Season 1.  So much for her development throughout this season...

Also... I called it... I think the killer is a cop... I'm going to guess Reddick... I hope I'm wrong... cause that would make it too predictable...

View Logs: The Killing S3 Episode 9

Episode Title: Reckoning


Yeah ok... This show is officially the worst thing ever for killing off my favorite supporting cast character... Sorta... well ok.  I know that's a pretty biased assessment but goddammit... I liked Bullet so much more than Lyric or Twitch.  It just seemed like all the pair did was be idiots throughout the series so far and Bullet's really the only person on the streets who was aware and active.  Yet Lyric and Twitch get their happy ending, moving into a comfy home while Bullet winds up brutally slashed in some guy's trunk.  Ugh.  I can't say this is specifically bad writing but that ending left a bad taste in my circuits.  This show is primarily about how every little action can have such severe consequences and yet Lyric and Twitch seems to be the only two characters who made bad decisions and the consequences were positive.  Twitch, through little development, decides to grow up and give up his dream of moving to LA to "act" and "model".  And Lyric has just gotten lucky this whole time.  Admittedly, there's still three episodes to go so I'll have to wait and see what happens.  But I would like to see them grow a lot more rather than things suddenly going their way.

Well... atleast Danielle's character has developed tremendously since the beginning of the show.  While her character arc is a little obvious, it's still fairly intriguing to see how she gradually realized what an absentminded mother she was to Kallie.  The writers this time around decided to develop her character through interacting with people which was a good decision in the long run.  Part of the problem with the mother of Rosie Larson in Season 1 was that she spent nearly all of her time alone and sobbing and those scenes ended up dragging and stagnating.

Of course, people who withdraw from the world can make great characters.  But it seems like every time the show decides to apply this kind of treatment to it's characters it just ends up stewing within it's own writing... never really going anywhere.


Speaking of never really going anywhere... Seward... I'm still utterly confused and baffled by this character.  Maybe I'm missing something?  But at the beginning he seemed like such a cold hard criminal... going as far as killing a prison chaplain by beating his skull in... and now suddenly he has all these regrets?  I understand that the show is trying to display Seward realizing more and more that he's going to die and it's making him change.  But the extremes of his actions and mannerisms between first few episodes and the most recent ones just don't really match and feel contrived.  There wasn't nearly enough development to warrant a character change this drastic... what... he let his friend hang himself in jail?  And... that's it?  To be honest when that happened he didn't really seem to care too much so you can't use that as a catalyst for his character change.

Going back to the plot... I think I'm right... the killer might be someone in a position of authority.  Either the warden or Reddick.  I still think I might be right.  If I am, I'm going to be very mad.

7/19/13

The 2013 Outstanding Screen Fictions Emmy list!

Well... Emmy time is amongst us again.  I'd say the biggest surprise of the year is House of Cards.  Honestly didn't expect it on here within it's first season.   The other drama noms are fairly expected.  It just might be Game of Throne's year for best drama if House of Cards doesn't steal it.  There were rumors that Fox's The American was going to make it.  But this didn't turn out to be the case.  Personally I really wanted Person of Interest to get a nod... but the Emmys seem a little like the Oscars in which they don't look too fondly on procedural drama shows.  Comedies tend to be another story however...

The comedy noms are weaker.  Not sure about The Big Bang Theory.  The best of that series was definitely towards the beginning and the last season really regressed into a typical relationship based sitcom... I wouldn't consider it bad just yet but it's definitely the weakest the show has ever been and the whole thing isn't exactly that amazing to begin with.  Surprised that Archer or Parks&Recs aren't a part of this list.

So in terms of fictional shows that's really it.  Boardwalk Empire has fallen out of favor and House of Cards replaced it.  The only real stinker here is American Horror Story... Outstanding "miniseries"?  What?  Very unsure why this was nominated.  American Horror Story didn't deserve it's nomination last year based on it's writing quality and Season 2 didn't improve enough for me.  It's reoccurring presence at the Emmys really baffles me.  History Channel continue to scrape into the list with The Bible, which is better than Hatfields & McCoy but still pales a little compared to it's nominated peers.  Ugly Americans is also notably absent from the animated list... so that's just my first knee-jerk reaction to the list.

Anyways here's the complete outstanding fiction list:

Outstanding Comedy Series
Outstanding Drama Series

Outstanding Miniseries or Movie

Outstanding Animated Program



7/15/13

View Logs: The Killing S3 Episode 8

Episode Title: Try

I wonder if the writers of the show are starting to realize how much of a deadweight Seward's plotline is. I know it's going to be tied into the main storyline of the show eventually and there'll probably be some kind of twist with the guards and Seward.  I just hope it won't be contrived like the previous seasons.  Seward only has a few scenes in this episode and all of them are meant to serve as either foreshadowing or extra motivation for the main characters.

Keep in mind that the prison plotline started out fairly equal to all the others when the show started.  How much this plotline has scaled back should be an indicator that there wasn't enough there to really make it a major sideplot to begin with.  Seward as a character himself continues to baffle me.

Why does he suddenly not want to hang when at the early part of the episode he wanted to go out with as much trouble as possible?  Was he just merely throwing a tantrum at the beginning of the series because he was unfairly convicted?  Maybe it's plausible that a person will actually self-destruct if they are innocently condemned to death, but the way Seward was written he seemed to want to convince the world that he could do more damage to society.  I mean he bashed the fricking prison chaplain's head in.  That's not something an innocent man would do.  That's something a serial killer would do just to prove a point.

Now suddenly he has this great fear of dying, he desperately wants to "stop the hanging", and he starts begging Linden to try harder?  Excuse me?  There's character development and then there's character 180s.  Sometimes the difference is subtle but that subtle difference is the line between great writing and just contrived sloppy writing.

The best character twists are ones that you don't see coming while experiencing it but you do see it in retrospect.  This show just seems to have a general problem with setting up and executing twists when it comes to its characters.

BTW, Pastor Mike... (spoilers... he's not the one...) is another great example.  The way he was shot during the last episode was genius.  The sinister lighting, the intimidating blocking, everything was well executed except the way he was written.  What I mean by that is the dialogue and his character direction is just a more minor version of Seward's character sloppiness.  His dialogue is so suggestively evil in the previous episode and now at the end of this episode he spills his history as a misunderstood priest.

So there's nothing actually creepy about him?  There's no real closet skeletons?  He's secretive because he was falsely accused and people just assumed he's a perverted pastor?  So why did the previous episode's dialogue sound so sinisterly creepy?  See what I mean by this show having a problem setting up and pulling off character twists?

It's such a shame because this show is so well shot.  But the writing is just goddamm schizophrenic sometimes that it takes me out of the show.

So yes this episode is a step back... despite that Linden and Holder remain as strong characters.  In fact, Linden's dialogue with Pastor Mike during the car ride is surprisingly interesting on Linden's side.

I haven't written anything about Bullet before because I didn't think there was much to write about.  I'm starting to like Bullet more and more.  She seems as just a random street punk in the beginning but she now has developed quite a bit of depth.  She's one of the few side characters that the show hasn't been ruined with sloppy writing.  (Lyric IS one btw... don't get me started on her.  I'll complain about her later).

The plot twist at the end of the episode is fine... although at this point it's very obvious that this is the show's formula... so every episode I expected a huge "reveal" cliffhanger.  I tolerated that with Battlestar Galactica... but in this show almost every single episode ends off with that kind of cliffhanger.  It's now annoying... anyways the twist is that Bullet finds out who the killer is.  She tries to contact Holder but he doesnt respond to her because they had a spat in this episode... so she is waiting at a random diner thinking what to do and the final shot is of someone driving in a car scoping her out.  It's heavily implied that it's the killer (although with this show you never know...)

I have a theory... I'm going to guess it's either a cop (Reddick?) or Seward's warden... Actually the ladder would make dramatic sense since Seward's plotline is obviously setting up for some kind of twist near the end of the season... If I'm right on either one... this show will be the worst thing ever...